Poultry Sustainability & Carbon Footprint Software
The carbon calculation runs on data the platform already captures — feed consumption and composition, electricity, diesel, water, mortality. No separate data-collection project, which is exactly where most agri carbon programs fail.
What you manage
Emissions calculation
Carbon per kilo of chicken, per farm, per flock — from operational records.
Feed-driven footprint
Feed composition and consumption — the dominant share — from the mill's own data.
Energy, water & inputs
Electricity, diesel, gas, and water tracked per site alongside production.
Flock & site comparisons
Carbon intensity compared across farms, flocks, and seasons — like cost.
Reduction scenarios
Feed program A vs. B by carbon intensity, argued with your own records.
Export-ready reports
Reports formatted for customers and regulators, generated from live data.
Signature insight
Carbon accounting at the same granularity as cost accounting
You already know your cost per kilo by farm and flock. The Sustainability module reports carbon per kilo the same way — computed continuously from feed, energy, and mortality records — so an emissions number is as answerable as a cost number, and a reduction plan is a management decision, not a consulting engagement.
Connected to
Frequently asked questions
Do we need a separate data-collection effort for carbon reporting?
No — that is the point. Feed, energy, water, and mortality are already recorded in the operational modules; the carbon calculation runs on those records continuously.
Why do poultry companies need this now?
Global QSR chains, exporters, and retailers increasingly require Scope 3 emissions data from suppliers. Built-in carbon reporting is becoming a condition of keeping those contracts — this is revenue protection, not green marketing.
Can we compare reduction options before committing?
Yes — because feed is the dominant driver, scenarios like feed program A vs. B can be compared on carbon intensity using your own formulation and performance data.